Positive Chick-Fil-A Development

Some positive news from the Chick-Fil-A LGBT civil rights front. In what appears to be a rather illuminated and magnanimous gesture, following a retreat with campus leaders in Atlanta, the Chick-Fil-A organization has issued a statement indicating they will acknowledge the civil rights of all people, including those who associate with the LGBT community. They will also stop their controversial donations to anti-LGBT groups through their non-profit charitable arm WinShape. According to the Civil Rights Agenda (TCRA), a watchdog organization for LGBT rights who was involved in the disucssions, an internal Chick-Fil-A memo to franchisees and stakeholders indicates:

• As a company, they will “treat every person with honor, dignity and respect-regardless of their beliefs, race, creed, sexual orientation and gender…[their]…intent is not to engage in political or social debates.” source

• “The WinShape Foundations is now taking a much closer look at the organizations it considers helping, and in that process will remain true to its stated philosophy of not supporting organizations with political agendas.” In meetings the company executives clarified that they will no longer give to anti-gay organizations, such as Focus on the Family and the National Organization for Marriage. source

This blog entry is not meant to be a full summary of the discussion. More detailed articles on the topic: Boston Spirit Magazine, Huffington Post, and Chicago Phoenix.

Letter from physics faculty and staff regarding Chick-Fil-A at Cal Poly SLO

Today I sent Cal Poly President Armstrong, Cal Poly Corporation Director Murphy, and Dean of the College of Science and Mathematica Phil Bailey the following letter from the undersigned physics faculty and staff. An individual’s name missing from the signatories list in no way implies a philosophical position on the issue — only that they did not reply to a call for signatories by the designated deadline.

Dear President Armstrong,
We the undersigned Cal Poly faculty and staff are writing to express concern regarding our University’s business relationship with Chick-Fil-A. The company’s business philosophy, recently expressed by their corporate leadership on a national scale, actively and unapologetically opposes the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons. Because of the recent intolerant public statements made by the company’s leadership, their unusually strict hiring and employment practices, and the nature of their corporate donations, we believe Chick-Fil-A’s presence on campus contributes to creating an intolerant climate that violates the spirit and letter of our University mission as well as Cal Poly’s Diversity Learning Objectives. We recommend that our business relationship with Chick-Fil-A be terminated immediately.

For example, Forbes, referring to Chick-Fil-A as a “cult,” has reported that their rigorous internal hiring and screening practices were unusually narrow, filtering selectively on people that only share their religious and family-oriented worldview. In addition, public records indicate Chick-Fil-A donates profits to groups that aggressively work against the civil rights of LGBT people. For example, Chick-Fil-A profits have supported, through their charitable arm WinShape:

• The Marriage and Family Foundation, an organization devoted to upholding traditional marriage.

• The Fellowship of Christian Athletes which openly regards homosexuality as an “impure lifestyle.”

• Exodus International, which claims to “cure homosexuality” through psychological coercion of LGBT people. It says LGBT people are “perverse.”

• Focus on the Family (FOF) and its offshoot group, Family Research Council (FRC), which has been designated as a hate group by Southern Poverty Law Center. FOF aggressively defames LGBT people as a threat to children.

We do recognize the First Amendment Right of business and individuals to support causes and express views protected under the law, even if we disagree with them. However, not inconsistent with this, Cal Poly also has a responsibility to choose campus partners whose values are aligned with our own mission as a University. As part of its policies and campus culture, Cal Poly has regularly taken formal positions against otherwise protected speech and actions in the context of racism, sexism, and other forms of unprofessional behavior that are not illegal, but which create an uncomfortable or hostile work or learning environment. Indeed, harassment guidelines mandate that we investigate instances where individuals are made to feel uncomfortable because of their sexual orientation, amongst other protected categories.

We can respect and celebrate the First Amendment Rights of all viewpoints, even those that violate our University mission, by providing a forum for open talks, debates, workshops, seminars, colloquia, courses, and protests. Any and all viewpoints should be welcomed in that context. But this celebration of intellectual openness and free speech does not obligate us to directly do business with companies promoting particular viewpoints. Moreover, we do not have to provide them a storefront on campus.
In addition to terminating our business relationship with Chick-Fil-A, we urge the University and Cal Poly Corporation to take issues like these into consideration when renewing campus partnerships and while developing any new partnerships in the future.

Sincerely,

Thomas D. Gutierrez, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Jonathan Fernsler, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Antonio F. Garcia, Professor of Geology, Physics Department
David Mitchell, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Richard Saenz, Professor, Ret., former Chair, Physics Department
Karl Saunders Associate Professor, Physics Department
Anthony Buffa, Professor, Ret. Physics Department
Jennifer Klay, Assistant Professor, Physics Department
Glen Gillen, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Thomas Bensky, Professor, Physics Department
Vardha Bennert Assistant Professor, Physics Department
William B. Horst, Lecturer, Physics Department
David Arndt, Technician, Physics Department
John Mottman, Professor, Ret., former Chair, Physics Department
Matthew J. Moelter, Professor, former Chair, Physics Department
Katharina Gillen, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Pete Schwartz, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Randall Knight, Professor, Ret., Physics Department
Scott Johnston, Assistant Professor of Geology, Physics Department
Ronald E. Zammit, Professor, Ret., Physics Department
Robert H. Dickerson, Professor Emeritus, former Chair, Physics Department

Faculty Contact:
Thomas D. Gutierrez Physics Department
California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
September 9, 2012

CP_ChickFilA_091012sig

Forwards Backwards Songs

As a musical exercise, I’ve been experimenting with taking standard, famous songs and arranging a backwards version as a forward song (“backwards forwards” for short). I don’t use the original recording in any way, only part of the musical arrangement. The result is usually something that (naturally) has weird overtones of the original song, but also is a unique song in its own right.

My first effort was at tune called My Sweet Satan, an instrumental backwards forwards version of Stairway to Heaven by Led Zeppelin. The title is a play off of the famous backmasking fiasco that followed the song through its heyday and beyond. The haunting refrain of “my sweet Satan” can apparently be heard in verse five (somewhere around “There’s still time to change the road you’re on”). However, if you listen, it is clearly a combination of audio pareidolia and straightforward phonetic reversal rather than active backmasking. One can, of course, carefully craft forwards lyrics that do have phonetic reversals that sound like actual messages when played backwards. But Robert Plant’s lyric clearly isn’t that. I’ve tried doing such constructions myself and, with a specific backwards message in mind, you certainly don’t get anything nearly as coherent as the lyrics to Stairway (and that’s saying something).

Another effort is called But You Can Never Leave. Can you guess which backwards forward song it might be? A hint is that it is a song known (apocryphally) for having a backmasked message. The biggest clue is in the title.

If you like what you hear, take a listen to some of work by Agapanthus and consider purchasing it (or parts you like). You can also find many of my tunes on YouTube or Spotify under Agapanthus for free.